Date
, 10:00 AM EST (US)
Participants
Scott Imlay
Kamenetskiy, Dmitry S
Giorgos Strofylas (BETA CAE)
In attendance
Steering Committee Issues
- Removal of CU-Boulder from Steering Committee (Thomas Hauser is now at NCAR). Passed
- Scot Breitenfeld to update the web page.
Note: Numeca is looking for a new representative, to be discussed in the next meeting.
Discussion topics
Item | Presenter | Notes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Approve 2021/12/14 minutes. |
Approved. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
high-level editing tools for the documentation page | Help needed to divide the remaining tasks: https://github.com/CGNS/cgns.github.io/projects/1 The documentation goes into the source using Doxygen. This work uses the “doxygen” branch. Examples are given for cg_open and cg_version. The aliases used for repeated variable descriptions are in src/doxygen/doxygen.config. Need volunteers to help with translating the remaining APIs to Doxygen.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Converting CGNSTalk archive to Github Discussion Posts | Started converting the CGNSTalk archive to github discussion posts. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Discussion Topic | Short discussion on past AMR CPEX (0008) and whether AMR should be revisited as a feature supported CGNS. Some groups may be already using CGNS with AMR, but not known for certain. The need for AMR support in CGNS is unknown. Vicky Moschou Tobias Leicht ZJ Wang to discuss progressing CPEX 0008. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Status update on Accepted CPEX #0045
| The branch CPEX45_high_order has not been updated since Feb 25, 2020. An update from Koen Hillewaert on the status is needed.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Discussion Topic | Proposal to have Monitoring numerical probes description to the standard. Some groups may already use CGNS to do that, but their is a need to have a shared approach.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Status update on Accepted CPEX #0047 Proposed Data integration Points | Working on the new website before creating a new development branch to prevent duplicating efforts. Started prototyping with python and C and will push a branch on github in the upcoming weeks. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Status of Future CPEX 0046
| There is no one available to move forward wth the CPEX. Scot Breitenfeld will remove it from the discussion topics.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Status of Future CPEX 0044
| The current focus is on finishing and implementing CPEX 45. Tabling CPEX 0044 for now.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
prioritization, review and attribution of JIRA bugs/issues | Next release 4.4.0, Kanban: https://cgnsorg.atlassian.net/jira/software/c/projects/CGNS/boards/4 General Kanban Board: ISSUE CARRIED OVER: Platform proposals Do we test both 32bit (legacy) and 64bit API? It's a minor point, but it would a good idea to add 32bit to at least one Linux and Windows NEW (June 2021) We need to add Intel OneAPI compilers to the list of supported compilers (note: OneAPI C/C++ compiler is very different to existing legacy one) Bug list:
A priority of bugs to fix in next release #1
Crucial to Ansys. Although most HPC is Linux, project set-up often was done on Windows and import/export/sharing of mesh/solution done on Windows, while most runs performed on Linux clusters
#4
#5
#6
|
Action items from last meetings
Task report | ||
---|---|---|
|
Decisions
Decision report | ||
---|---|---|
|
New Business
Any new CGNS funding proposal opportunities? Nothing was identified at the meeting.
Status | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
Schedule next meeting
, 10:00 AM EST (US)