Date
, 10:00 AM EST (US)
...
Item | Presenter | Notes | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Approve 2023/4/4 minutes. |
Approved | |||||||||
Released 4.4.0 | Lots of outstanding contributions, thanks all. | |||||||||
cgns.org owner?? | Unknown, Registered through GoDaddy, who only contacts through a broker service. | |||||||||
high-level editing tools for the documentation page | Help needed to divide the remaining tasks: https://github.com/CGNS/cgns.github.io/projects/1 The documentation goes into the source using Doxygen. This work uses the “Doxygen” branch. Examples are given for cg_open and cg_version. The aliases used for repeated variable descriptions are in src/Doxygen/Doxygen.config. We need volunteers to help with translating the remaining APIs to Doxygen.
| |||||||||
Converting CGNSTalk archive to Github Discussion Posts | No update. | |||||||||
Coupled fluid-structure standard addition | Proposal to standardize fluid-structure simulations submitted, No update. | |||||||||
mixed element/face zones discussion | https://github.com/CGNS/CGNS/discussions/720
Unrelated, the files also cause Paraview to crash. | |||||||||
Status update on Accepted CPEX #0045
| No Discussion | The branch CPEX45_high_order has not been updated since Feb 25, 2020. An update from Koen Hillewaert on the status is needed. Regarding the two topics that I might want to say something on, I have collected some input – feel free to use it (or not):
There is currently no one actively working on this, we will keep the project on the meeting agenda, but we don’t expect any updates. | ||||||||
Open Discussion about backward compatibility issues | Discussion about backward compatibility issues discovered recently. Ansys and others, have encountered backward compatibility issues with 4.3.0. All the problems with backward compatibility will try to be addressed and fixed before the 4.4.0 release. All interested parties should create an issue or contact the CGNS developers to ensure their problem has been addressed.
| |||||||||
Discussion Topic | Proposal to have Monitoring numerical probes described in the standard. Some groups may already use CGNS to do that, but there is a need to have a shared approach.
…to me, the proposal looks fine. I just have a minor remark on naming, in order to avoid potential confusion. It certainly sounds as if NumberOfSamples gives us the number of samples. According to the proposal, this is not the case, however, since “the number of samples is equal to NumberOfSamples modulo Sampling. Samples = NumberOfSamples % Sampling;” So, not only is the number defined differently, but we also have three very similar names around the underlying term of sample. I propose to use more distinctive names. I’m not great at finding appropriate names myself, but things one could consider would be
Maybe someone else has a better proposal, or perhaps others don’t think it needs improvement. Let’s discuss this later today.
Best regards, Tobias | |||||||||
Status update on Accepted CPEX #0047 Proposed Data integration Points | Working on the new website before creating a new development branch to prevent duplicating efforts. Started prototyping with python and C and will push a branch on GitHub in the upcoming weeks. (The “C” branch is a slow work in progress) We may have a prototype to show at the next meeting. | |||||||||
prioritization, review and attribution of JIRA bugs/issues | Next release 4.5.0, Kanban: https://github.com/orgs/CGNS/projects/5 Current status for Ansys: No urgent issues.
|
...